Let’s ignore the question of whether the rest of the world is entitled to the United State’s defense budget and examine the following letter that was printed in yesterday’s Globe and Mail:
London, Ont. — Re The Mostly Right Stuff: How The Americans Make War (Dec. 22): Marcus Gee notes that Washington spends more than $300-billion a year on its armed forces, more than seven other major nations combined. Let’s imagine that amount being spent on peace, not war.
Over the years, it could have provided clean drinking water, sanitation, primary education and basic housing for the world’s population; set up health clinics and treated malnutrition, leprosy, AIDS and blindness; solved problems of environmental degradation, inequitable food supplies and desperate living standards.
With this money, Washington could have practised genuine aid and also paid its fair share to the United Nations and international organizations. Its influence might have inspired other nations to follow — including Canada.
Had all this happened, we might be living in a different and more compassionate world. Mr Gee’s statement that “the U.S. military had a job to do in Afghanistan” would not have applied. Money is always available. We choose whether to use it to destroy or benefit the world.
“What $300-billion could do“, Jane Vincent-Havelka, The Globe and Mail (Letters), 2001.12.27
Why do these people always assume that the United States should be on the hook for saving the world? Of course, they don’t really: they just think that the US is to blame, no matter what the circumstances. Malnutrition, leprosy, AIDS, blindness: human inflictions caused by the United States. As an aside, did anyone figure our if the reason the US is responsible for 9/11 is because they have too many McDonalds in the Middle East, or not enough of them? If the US really did spend $300 billion a year in the rest of the world handing out goods, we’d be reading letters accusing them of economic and/or cultural imperialism.
Since most of the complaining classes are from outside of the United States, what would happen if the rest of the G7 picked up the slack in defense spending and dedicated the money to saving the world. As you can see from the table below, we wouldn’t have $300 billion, but we’d be well on our way with $95 billion.
Dollar figures in billions of USD. Source CIA World Factbook
Aggregate
US
Canada
France
UK
Italy
Germany
Japan
Population
696,331,726.0
278,058,881
31,592,805
59,551,227
59,647,790
57,679,825
83,029,536
126,771,662
GDP
$19,904.7
$9,963.0
$774.7
$1,448.0
$1,360.0
$1,273.0
$1,936.0
$3,150.0
Defense
$457.4
$276.7
$7.5
$39.8
$36.9
$20.7
$32.8
$43.0
Defense (%)
2.30%
2.78%
0.97%
2.75%
2.71%
1.63%
1.69%
1.37%
Defense/Person
$656.89
$995.11
$237.40
$668.85
$618.36
$358.88
$395.04
$339.19
Shortfall
$95.4
$0.0
$14.0
$0.4
$0.9
$14.7
$21.0
$44.5