Ranting and Roaring

2006/01/31

4 Things

Joey tagged me last week so here goes:

Four Jobs I’ve Had

  • Handyman (for three summers, starting at 14 years old)
  • Senior Developer, IBM
  • Software Research, Algorithmics
  • Founder, BlogMatrix (pay may be improving soon)

Four Movies I Can Watch Over and Over

  • Star Wars
  • Zoolander
  • Repo Man
  • The Matrix Trilogy — Fast Forward Edition (excludes all parts not in The Matrix)

Four Places I have Lived

  • St. John’s
  • Toronto, Annex
  • Vienna
  • North York, Armor Heights/Lawrence Park

Four Television Shows I Love to Watch

  • Battlestar Galactica
  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer
  • Family Guy
  • Simpsons

Four Places I Have Been on Vacation

  • Napa Valley
  • New Orleans
  • Budapest
  • Arahova (Greece)

Four of My Favourite Dishes

  • Hanger steak, CIA
  • Steak Frites, Le Select Bistro
  • Macaroni and Cheese, my home made version — not KD
  • Greek salad in a pita

Four Websites I Visit Daily

Four Places I Would Rather Be Right Now

  • Any Western European country, with a cost-of-living adjustment
  • St. John’s — for any weekend, many times a year
  • Barbados — with a nice big fat risk management contract
  • Silicon Valley — anywhere, for one year only

Four People I am Now Tagging to Prepare the Same Lists

  • I have decided I am going to be a “leaf” node for all memes

2006/01/27

Recent Acquisitions

2006/01/25

Naomi Wolf vs. Jesus Smackdown

I love Kathy’s title/question ”Did she tell him to wear a brown suit…?” Note that Wolf had a very typical encounter with Jesus:

Wolf emphasised that her spiritual renewal strengthened her commitment to feminism as her life mission. “I believe that each of us is here to help repair the world,” she said. “My particular mission seems to be about helping women remember what’s sacred about them or what’s sacred about femininity .”

i.e. Jesus happened to agree with what she already believed, 100%.

2006/01/24

Steyn nails it

Steyn on Canada:

I overestimated the appeal of the right, the left and the separatists and underestimated the appeal of a party of floundering discredited kleptocrat incompetents who fought one of the most staggeringly awful campaigns in modern political history. Truly, the resilience of the Liberal Party of Canada is amazing.

I think this is another symptom of Canada’s “passion for bronze”. A large number of people I’ve talked to simply couldn’t care less about government corruption. My observation is that if someone says “all parties are corrupt”, it’s a pretty good indicator you’re talking to a Liberal.

Coyne nails it

More

  • Next election in 29 months. The CPC has lots it can work with with the other parties and everyone’s short on cash.
  • The Reform agenda is dead. The age of the Red Tory is gone; behold the Purplish Conservative.
  • Belinda: she’s won her seat, but she won’t win the leadership and one wonders if the new order to come thinks they owe her any favours.
  • Toronto: you suck — you should have voted NDP if you think the CPC is that scary. Except for Trinity-Spadina — Chow’s part-time commitment to her constituents and full time commitment to her political career should have told you to give her a pass; what did poor old Tony Ianno ever do to you?
  • The CPC should ignore the Globe and Mail’s editorial advise and get the gay marriage thing out of the way (with a private member bill) right away. It worked in the campaign, it’ll work now — and it will make it a settled issue.
  • The CPC has to make a serious effort to get the number of women running for seats above 25, maybe 30%, if they want to look credible in the next election. IMHO.
  • A few successful immigrants wouldn’t hurt either.

And the losers are…

  1. The Liberals. You lost.
  2. The Bloc Quebecois. Where’s your 50%, traitor boys and girls? Quebec wants in; maybe you should take a powder.
  3. The Conservatives. My benchmark for failure was below 125. A breakthroughs in Quebec, but you got damned little elsewhere compared to what was available.
  4. The NDP. You don’t hold the balance of power.

And the winners are…

  1. The Liberal Party of Canada. The Liberals can say goodbye to Martin and his band of losers and have a serious shot at winning the next election with a fresh face. The Liberals know that, even with credible accusations of using the RCMP as the force wing, mob ties, massive corruption and kickback schemes, having done nothing at all for the city of Toronto, they can still count on 100+ seats.
  2. The Conservatives. They won the election. Sort of.
  3. The NDP. When I went to bed last night, these guys were by #2 choice, but coming under 30 seats drops them down a notch. If you’re a taker by nature, a failure by choice or by design, or just think that your natural superiority gives you the right to boss other humans around, the NDP is the party for you.
  4. The Bloc (pyrrhic victory award). The CPC + NDP does not equal a majority, so the Bloc is in play in parliament.

2006/01/23

On the other hand

Contrast: by 7:30 AM, I’ve usually put it two hours of solid work, 30 minutes of hard cardio at the gym, and have watched a bit of taped TV or DVD.

2006/01/22

Party Visits

Someone for the Green Party came by the house yesterday to give us their brochure. I’m cursing and swearing because I thought of a great line ten seconds after they left: “I’ll be supporting the Green Party by putting this straight away in the blue bin”. OK, it’s not great but it would have been pretty funny.

And someone from Joe Volpe’s office called a few seconds ago. There’s been no sign of the CPC Candidate, whose name eludes me at this second, but strangely enough, scores of blue signs have popped up in my neighbourhood suring the last two weeks. Last election it was all red.

California – Mashup Camp

I just booked my tickets for Mashup Camp in Mountain View, California on the 20th and 21st of February. Mashups are about combining content from different sources to create new applications (e.g. Google Maps + LCBO = The Ontario Beer Hunter).

I’m hoping to meet some of the big brains of the mashup world, talk about JAHAH and a new application I’m developing using that and the BlogMatrix platform and microformats.

Tagged: jahah, microformats, blogmatrix, mashup camp.

2006/01/18

Pandora

Pandora is a personalized web-based music player. You create “radio stations” by entering songs or artists you like. It then plays songs (in a Flash based player) that are somewhat similar to the song you selected. You can shape the playlist by giving a thumbs up or thumbs down to the selections it has made for you.

Colby Cosh gives Pandora a lukewarm review—”Not as crushingly disappointing as other services like it”—but I’m fairly impressed.

Here’s my comments:

  • It is really like a radio station in one key way: you can’t go back and revisit a song you’ve already played or move around within a song. You can pause the station, which is nice. I assume these restrictions are due to copyright laws.
  • You have to give a US zip code to register. I’m sure you all watched TV in the nineties, so this shouldn’t be too challenging.
  • It’s too bad it’s not more of an HTML/AJAX interface than a Flash one. I’m always finding myself slightly taken aback with maneuvering through the system
  • I’ve found a few interesting artists which I hope to revisit later, but…
  • … Pandora really needs the concept of an “audio thumbnail”, something like a twenty second clip at lo-fi, for the favorites list. Names of artists I’ve never heard of doesn’t really help me that much
  • It would be nice (in the future) if they could link to the artist’s website. I know this is somewhat difficult.
  • It would be nice (in the future, when there’s an official Canadian version) if they could link to Amazon.ca, since that’s where I buy my CDs from
  • I find myself trying to outguess the AI, which means I’m probably not fairly rating things thumbs up or thumbs down. This may not be a problem for you. It would be nice if there was a feature to intelligently and automatically split a radio station into multiple copies if there’s multiple competing styles.

I hope to delve into more techno/eurotrash music. I’m basically listening to bands that 75% sound like the Skydiggers.

The Janes Platform: Gun Crime and the Justice System

Long delays before trial is an affront to society and an injustice to the accused. The Janes Party shall significantly increase the amount of money available to the justice system to ensure that criminal cases are brought quickly to court.

There will be long mandatory sentences for those convicted of using a firearm to commit a criminal act.

The Janes party will immediately deport non-citizens to their home countries after they have been convicted of a serious criminal offence and have served their sentences.

2006/01/15

The Janes Platform: The Young Offenders Act

The Janes Party believes in second chances and is also a believer in justice. However, the current YOA has engendered an attitude amongst a small but significant number of youth that crime is without serious consequence. The young criminal of today is the adult criminal of tomorrow.

The Janes party will modify the YOA such that offenders are sentenced as both youth and as an adult, the adult sentence being suspend on further good behavior. If the offender is sentenced in the future as an adult for serious criminal offence, the suspended sentences shall re-instated and the offender’s youth criminal record shall be made public.

No person shall be eligible for Canadian citizenship until the term of their YOA suspended sentences are over.

The Janes Platform: EI

A Janes government will ensure that the EI program only collects enough money to cover its obligations and not act as a regressive-taxation piggy bank for the government.

The Janes Platform: Childcare

A Janes government believes that the basic obligations of a family are best met by that family. Thus, a Janes government will have no child care or day care program.

However, a Janes government also believes that strong, healthy families living outside an environment of poverty is essential for the long term survival of Canada. Furthermore, a Janes government recognizes that women shoulder the primary burden and long term career effects of having children. Thus, a Janes government will give every woman one year (of their choice) income tax free for every Canadian child they give birth to. This program is non-retroactive.

The Janes Platform: The Debt and Deficit

A Janes government will not run a debt nor a surplus. Income tax rates will be adjusted equally across the board quarterly to ensure this remains true. A Janes government will not pay down the debt, believing that keeping money in the hands of the Canadian people and growing the economy to the point where the debt is an irrelevancy is a more effective strategy.

The Janes Platform: Constitutional Reform

A Janes government, believing that Canada’s issues are solvable within the current framework of governance, will be firmly opposed to any constitutional change (excepting issues affecting and brought forward by a single province, such as Newfoundland and Labrador’s abolishing of the denominational school system).

The Janes Platform: Medicare Reform

Canadians are comfortable with and believe they have been well served by the current medical system in place in Canada. On the other hand the cost of delivering medicine increases every year, waiting lists are long and possibly increasing in length and our aging population will increase the demand for medical services every year.

Furthermore, the Janes party is uncomfortable with the left-wing philosophy of “criminalization” of delivering medical services which offensive to the core to the nature of Canada as a free country. The top-down nature of a federal government interfering in an area of provincial power is also a reason for concern.

A Janes government, in its first term, will provide a substantial incremental improvement to our medical system. A Janes government will allow single purpose “client-pays” clinics, similar to the Shouldice clinic in Toronto, to operate and bill our medicare system up to the cost currently charged by existing institutions. These clinics will be able to provide services such as medical imaging, hip or knee surgery, oncology treatments, cutting-edge gerontology treatments and so forth.

A Janes government will also allow provincial governments wide latitude, similar to that given to the province of Quebec today, to determine other public/private treatment options suitable for their citizenry.

2006/01/12

And don’t forget ‘Come On Eileen’

Jeff Jarvis writes:

Dr. Phil, that hack quack, is giving relationship advice on Match.com to fools stupid enough to pay for such wisdom as, “If you want to be a winner in love, you want to be a winner in relationships, then do what it takes.”

Why do I always think of stalkers from the 80’s when I hear that sort of thing?

2006/01/11

Cool!

(Look closely)

2005: a year in cities

Following the lead from this, here are the cities and town I’ve visited and spent at least one night in during 2005:

  • New York
  • Jack’s Lake
  • Windsor
  • Kingston
  • Niagara-on-the-Lake
  • London (UK)
  • Arahova (GR)
  • Mykonos
  • Athens
  • Halifax
  • Carmel (California)
  • Palo Alto
  • Napa
  • Waterloo
  • St. John’s

Generate your own Liberal-style attack ad

I decided to have a little fun with DHTML this morning. If you want to generate your own attack ad, go here.

Every time you vote Conservative, Stephen Harper kills a kitten.

Generate your own Liberal-style attack ad here.

2006/01/10

16 or 15

Via Al we learn that the CBC has reported:

Last November, before calling the election, the Liberals cut personal income taxes – a one per cent reduction to the lowest tax bracket, from 16 to 15 per cent, and an increase of $500 to the basic personal exemption

I thought this was a little strange on the part of the Conservatives but figured it was just part of a larger economic and taxation package. However, in this morning’s Financial Post I find out:

By the time Mr. Martin gets to the Canadian Club tomorrow, his attack on the Tory spending plan might be a little stale. Other Liberal claims about the Tory fiscal plan have been showing up in the media. The spin cycle on taxes began last week on CBC Television’s The National, where Neil MacDonald paraded Liberal spin as a Reality Check. The Conservative tax plan, said Mr. MacDonald, would “actually raise personal income taxes.”

Let us now reality check that Reality Check.

Here’s the story as told by Mr. Macdonald. Last Nov. 14, days before the Liberal government fell, Finance Minister Ralph Goodale unveiled a tax cut by lowering the lowest tax bracket by 1% to 15%. The Conservatives say they will raise the lowest rate back to 16%. Thus the Liberal tax cut, which “became law” last November, would be reversed by the Tories. Which means the Tories are “promising to raise income taxes.”

Over the past weekend, CanWest News Service repeated these ideas. The headline in The Edmonton Journal said, “Tories Would Drop Low-End Tax Cut.” The story reported that Stephen Harper said he would “repeal” a Liberal tax cut that had been “passed into law.”

So which is it? The lowering of the tax bracket is reported here:

An immediate drop of one percentage point in the lowest personal income tax rate, from 16 per cent to 15 per cent.

However, by immediately assumably the reporter meant “immediately after the mini-budget was passed”. Rummaging through the Parliament’s web site, we learn that Goodale introduced this plan as Bill C-80, An Act to implement certain income tax reductions:

1. (2) The tax payable under this Part by an individual on the individual’s taxable income or taxable income earned in Canada, as the case may be, (in this subdivision referred to as the “amount taxable”) for a taxation year is

(a) 15% of the amount taxable, if the amount taxable does not exceed $35,595;

So what’s the status of this bill? First Reading.

Also, the Liberal web site claims

The same day, the Conservatives confirmed they’re going to raise your income taxes by reversing some of the Liberal government tax cuts already in place. [...] In exchange for saving $500 on a one-time purchase, Mr. Harper is proposing to raise your income taxes this year.

… and that the lowest bracket of your 2006 income is 15%.

There is one fly in the ointment of my argument above. Continuing with the Financial Post article:

First of all, the Liberal tax cut never became law. The plan made it to first reading in the House of Commons. Then the government fell. There is no law, and legally the Liberal tax cut doesn’t exist. What we have is a Liberal election promise (after 12 years in power) to cut a tax rate just as their train was heading over a cliff.

We can easily confirm this by going to Revenue Canada and looking at the payroll deduction tables:

The federal tax rate for the lowest tax bracket is reduced
retroactively from 16% to 15% for the 2005 and 2006
tax years.

You can also see this in the Personal Tables for 2005 and 2006.

Now, here’s the tricky part to assert. (According to the FP), they are not doing this on the basis of passed law but rather anticipation that bill C-80 will be passed when Parliament resumes. Thus, Revenue Canada is collecting taxes at 15% rate but if nothing else changes they will be asking for 16% at the end of the year. This is not a raise in taxes, this is just under collecting.

What’s really bizarre is that we’re all about to file taxes at the 15% rate, but as far as I can see, we really owe money at the 16% rate.

To recap:

  • C-80 didn’t receive Royal Assent (it is officially ”Awaiting second reading” but since the 38th is over, it’s dead) and thus isn’t law
  • The lowest income tax bracket remains at 16%
  • Revenue Canada is collecting taxes in that bracket at 15%
  • If the Conservatives win, we may owe extra money in 2006 to make up for collection shortfalls over the last few months
  • The 15% tax rates claimed by the Liberals are “in place”. They’re just not law.

I’ll leave out judgment calls about who’s lying and who’s telling the truth, though there’s a certain admirable weaseliness to what the Liberals are claiming (and did) from a Machiavellian perspective.

2006/01/07

Spot the difference

The top two CBC headlines:

Someone’s aiming for a GG spot!

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress