Jay Currie endorses testing the idea of voting at 16:
Lowering the voting age seems to me to be a rather good idea. We do, after all, let 16 year olds drive cars which suggests, possibly wrongly, that they can be trusted with a good deal of responsibility.
The upside would be that teenagers would have a stake in the system from an earlier age. The downside would be that Hillary Duff might exercise political influence. In fact, setting sixteen as the voting age would make sense in that many teens have begun paying taxes and drawing benefits by then. Expanding the franchise to include people who are already contributing to the society would cost very little and might bring a bit more social cohesion. It will be interesting to see if the English do it and what the consequences are.
It's a horrible horrible idea. That's all we need is another group of voters who are 100% on the "taking" side of the societal equation, minds freshly molded with the best modern bigotries public education has to offer, led by the ultrarich dingbats in Hollywood whose only qualifications are good looks and the ability to parrot lines to the satisfaction of 55 year-old lechers (i.e as Jay says, the Hillary Duff types).
Perhaps we should reconsider letting 16 year olds drive (do we?) Voting age should be raised to the drinking age: at least they'll feel some of the impact of taxes have on the rest of us.

